Gay Boston Lesbian Boston




























News

Judaism Offers a Wide Range of Views on Same-Sex Marriage
by Joe Siegel
EDGE New England Editor
Tuesday May 26, 2009


Email Print Share
Opponents of same-sex marriage have cited the Bible and other Judeo-Christian dogma to portray gay and lesbian couples as inherently "immoral" and therefore, not deserving of the rights and benefits which society doles out to heterosexual couples.

As the cornerstorne of Western monotheism, Judaism gave birth to Christianity and Islam. It’s holy book, the Old Testament, is also cited as the source for God’s condemnation of homosexuality. But one of the world’s oldest religions has branched into sects which disagree violently on the subject.

The start with the source text, homosexual acts are among the many (many!) things proscribed, in this case as "to’evah," an abomination. A famous oft-quoted passage in Leviticus, 18:22, reads: "You shall not cohabit with a male as one cohabits with a woman; it is an abomination." Again, Leviticus 20:13: "If a man cohabits with a male as with a woman, both of them have done an abominable thing; they shall be put to death; their blood falls back upon them."
The passage takes on special meaning because Leviticus is one of the first five books of the Bible. Known as the Torah, or Pentateuch, these books constitute the core of Jewish belief.

Christian and Jewish fundamentalists often quote these passages as justifying a blanket condemnation of all same-sex sexual acts. They also cite the tale of Sodom and Gomorrah, the so-called Cities of the Plain, from Genesis.

In the story, Lot lives in Sodom, where he entertains three angels disguised as travelers. His neighbors demand he turn them out "so that we may know them." The original Hebrew has multiple meanings, one of them sexual. God tells Lot to flee Sodom and destroys the city with what has become the proverbial fire and brimstone.

The story of Sodom and the Levitical proscriptions present a stark way of approaching human sexuality that has influenced Western Civilization for thousands of years.

Shmuel Boteach is the chairman of the Oxford University L’Chaim Society and a prominent author who is also a rabbi in one of Judaism’s most conservative sects. He, however, uses a more open point of view in his interpretation of these passages.

Boteach has developed a more humane interpretation of God’s mandate for heterosexual acts and prohibition of homosexual acts. According to him, the Torah is against homosexual acts, not homosexual people. Judaism and God love all people. Boteach reminds us that the Torah also calls eating non-kosher food "’to’evah," an abomination. The word "to’evah" in the Torah does not depict a social repulsion.

Jewish communities in America are dealing, however, wit the here and now; and now, there are two essential issues that demand theological interpreation. The first and most urgent is whether or not the United States governmental bodies (including the states) should legalize same-sex marriage, thereby offering same-gender couples the same legal benefits that married heterosexual couples have.

The second deals with whether rabbis should perform same-sex Jewish weddings, and if so, can these ceremonies be considered kiddushin (the Hebrew term for holy unions)? This would give them equal stature with heterosexual marriages.

On May 8, two Orthodox Jewish groups issued a joint statement opposing the legalization of same-sex marriage in New York, where the issue is red-hot--and Jewish voters hold greater sway than anywhere else. Agudath Israel of America and the Orthodox Union, which together represent a broad coalition of observant, or Orthodox, Jews in New York City and State, said in a statement that "discarding the historical definition of marriage would pose a severe danger to society in a variety of ways."

"Moreover," the statement added, "we are deeply concerned that should any such redefinition occur, citizens of New York who are members of traditional communities like ours will incur moral opprobrium and risk legal sanction if they refuse to transgress their beliefs," the groups said. "That prospect is chilling, and should be unacceptable."

The groups said that they approach the issue "through the prism of the Jewish religious tradition, which forbids homosexual acts and sanctions only the union of a man and a woman in matrimony, the bedrock relationship of the human family."

The Reform Movement, which sits on the opposite side of the theological spectrum, also sits opposite orthodoxy in matters concerning gay unions as well. The Reform Movement began in Enlightenment Germany but took flower in the United States as a way to reconcile modern living with Jewish theology. By and large, it rejects strict adhesion to Torah laws in favor of broad interpretation of an expansive theology.

The Reform Movement has been in the forefront of religious denominations’ acceptance of homosexuality. It has long ordained out-gay rabbis and was the first major religious denomination in the United States to accept a liturgy for same-sex unions.

The Reform Movement has thus advocated for civil same-sex marriage for many years. The Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR), the professional association of Reform rabbis, passed a resolution in 1996 opposing "governmental efforts to ban gay and lesbian marriage." The Union of American Hebrew Congregations, the congregational arm of the Reform movement, followed suit in 1997, resolving to, "support secular efforts to promote legislation which would provide civil marriage equal opportunity for gay men and lesbians."

Rabbi Marc Gruber and Honey Heller, co-chairs of the Reform Jewish Voice of New York State, sent a letter to Governor David Paterson in support of legislation that would establish civil marriage equality in New York.

Heller and Gruber told Paterson "that civil marriage can exist in harmony with a diversity of beliefs on the issue of religious same-sex marriage. Our tradition has long celebrated and sanctified loving same-sex relationships. At the same time, we are cognizant that other faith traditions hold differing views on this issue. That is why it is essential that civil marriage laws are not rooted in theology, but in the principle of equal rights."

"Our religious values teach love and respect for all of humankind and that all people are created b’tselem Elohim, in the Divine image, deserving of tolerance, respect, love and equality," Heller and Gruber added.

The Jewish religion does not have a central leader, such as a pope, nor a central body that deliberates on issues (the ancient Sanhedrin is today an anachronism). As a result, multiple positions on same-sex marriage uneasily co-exist within the greater body of Judaism in America and the West in generally.

As the chief rabbi of Beth Simchat Torah in New York City, Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum has become a de facto spokesperson for LGBT Jews in the United States. Congregation Beth Simchat Torah is the nation’s largest and most prominent LGBT-oriented synagogue in the world (although many straight Jews who worship there as well).

Kleinbaum has been performing marriage ceremonies for same-gender couples for the past 19 years. Of course, none of them were legally binding.

"We provide resources and support and help to Jewish institutions, to rabbis, to Jews all over the world," Kleinbaum said. She believes that attitudes toward same-sex marriage and GLBT rights in general will continue to evolve in a positive direction in coming years.

"I think history is clear on this," Kleinbaum said. "This is the direction toward a full inclusion of GLBT people in all walks of life--Jewish, non-Jewish--as an act of justice. Anything less than the full inclusion of GLBT people in all aspects of life is bigotry and discrimination."

Same-sex marriage and other gay and lesbian issues meet with little consensus in the Conservative movement, which bridges the divide between the Reform and Orthodox sects. Conservatives adhere to Torah laws but interpret them more broadly and give more leeway than the Orthodox. For instance, most Conservatives will drive cars or ride public transportation on the Sabbath.

The interpretation of the standing ruling of its Committee of Jewish Law and Standards, which determines the official positions of Conservative Judaism, reflects takes the sect’s middle ground. The committee’s position is that Jewish law prohibits homosexuality, and therefore Jewish same-sex marriage is not appropriate. However, many influential Conservative leaders, including Rabbis Bradley Artson and Elliot Dorff, disagree with the Committee’s interpretation of Jewish law and call for support of civil and Jewish same-sex marriage.

The Conservative Rabbinical Assembly has endorsed civil rights for gay men and lesbians without specifically endorsing civil same-sex marriage. There is a small minority of Conservative rabbis who perform same-sex Jewish weddings, indicating the widespread division on this issue.

Judaism today is a diverse religion that encompasses everything from the Haradem, roughly equivalent to the Amish in their rejection of modern life, to radical Reform Jews, who reject most elements of traditional observance. No one should look for a single viewpoint of an explosive issue like same-sex marriage from a religion with such a broad spectrum of viewpoints.


Joe Siegel has written for a number of other GLBT publications, including In newsweekly and Options.


COMMENTS
"Judaism Offers a Wide Range of Views on Same-Sex Marriage"

Anonymous, 2009-05-26 07:22:32
Homosexuality is not a sin according to the Bible. Any educated Christian would know that. Scholars who have studied the Bible in context of the times and in relation to other passages have shown those passages (Leviticus, Corinthians, Romans, etc) have nothing to do with homosexuality. These passages often cherry-picked while ignoring the rest of the Bible. The sins theses passages are referring to are idolatry, prostitution, and rape, not homosexuality. http://www.cavalierdaily.com/CVArticle.asp?ID=10620&pid=805 http://www.jesus21.com/content/sex/bible_homosexuality_print.html http://www.christchapel.com/romans_inter.html http://www.stjohnsmcc.org/new/about/homosexuality.html http://www.gaychristian101.com/ Thats why Jesus never mentions it as well. There is nothing immoral, wrong, or sinful about being gay. Jesus, however, clearly states he HATES hypocrites. If you preach goodness, then promote hate and twist the words of the Bible, you are a hypocrite, and will be judged and sent to hell. Homosexuals will not go to hell, hypocrites will. This is very similar to the religious bigots of the past, where they took Bible passages to condone slavery, keep women down, and used Bible passages to claim blacks as curses who should be enslaved by the white man. People used God to claim that blacks marrying whites was unnatural, and not of God’s will.
Avg. Rating: 12345
Rate it:
12345
Anonymous, 2009-05-26 07:24:03
Let us examine some of the passages often cherrypicked out of the bible out of context, and what they really mean: Leviticus 18:22: "You shall not lie with a male as those who lie with a female; it is an abomination." Leviticus 20:13: "If a man lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination and they shall surely be put to death." Both of these verses refer to heterosexuals who participated in fertility rituals in order to guarantee good crops and healthy flocks, not homosexuals, there is absolutely no mention of sexual orientation or homosexuality. Also, the word abomination was used for anything that was considered to be religiously unclean or dealing with any type idol worship. The Hebrew word "toevah" was used in Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13. "Toevah" has been translated in our Bibles as "abomination" or "detestable". The "toevah" was used throughout the Old Testament for activity involving ethnic contamination and religious idolatry. "Toevah" refers to things that were ritually unclean - like eating pork. It is significant that another Hebrew word, "zimah," also translated "abomination," which means intrinsic evil or evil by its very nature, was not used in Leviticus 18:22, or Leviticus 20:13. It’s also significant that there’s no condemnation of female homosexual relationships in the Old Testament. This is further proof they are not talking about sexuality, they are talking about idolatry.
Avg. Rating: 12345
Rate it:
12345
Anonymous, 2009-05-26 07:24:32
The Sodom Story - Genesis 19:1-29 Homophobic Viewpoint: "Sodom was destroyed because of homosexuality." Scriptural Viewpoint: Sodom was a lush beautiful region of land whose inhabitants had known the goodness of God. Despite their exposure to, experience with, and witness of the one true loving Creator, the people of Sodom had rejected a relationship with God, and turned to numerous types of idolatry. When God’s messengers were sent to the city, the men of Sodom responded by threatening the ultimate act of violent abuse, murder, disrespect and humiliation. They were going to RAPE God’s representatives. All other Old and New Testament references to Sodom involved the sins of idolatry, inhospitality, indifference toward the poor and the rejection of God’s messengers. There are NO REFERENCES to same sex acts or HOMOSEXUALITY.
Avg. Rating: 12345
Rate it:
12345
Anonymous, 2009-05-26 07:25:05
Letters from the Apostle Paul Romans 1:26-27: Another common line pulled out of context. If taken out of context, this passage seems to condemn homosexuals. However, when Romans 1:26-27 is considered within the context of Romans 1:16 through Romans 2:16, the Scriptures clearly present a different teaching. Paul was writing to the church in Rome. The Roman church had become troubled by divisions related to spiritual pride. Paul was addressing the Christians in Rome and teaching about the pagans in Rome. After declaring the power of Christ’s gospel to save all, he pointed out that the religious people of Rome had refused to even acknowledge GOD as one of their many gods. They had turned their backs on the one true living God and worshiped handmade idols. Paul explained that as a result of their idolatry, every part of their lives had become corrupt and vile. Paul then told the Roman Christians that they were not to judge others. To judge others is to condemn yourself (Romans 2:1). Christians are to love others out of their brokenness and into the healing wholeness that is found in Jesus Christ. The Greek word Paul used, that has been translated in our Bibles as "natural/unnatural", relates to that which is against one’s own inherent nature (i.e., heterosexuals engaging in homosexual acts). It was also related to Paul’s concept of what was culturally acceptable. The same Greek word is used in I Cor. 11:14-15 in reference to correct hair length for men and women and in Gal. 2:15 in reference to Jews and Gentiles who were such by "nature." Paul emphasized that IDOLATRY (not homosexuality) was the evil which resulted in temple prostitution, sadomasochism, and lack of regard for others.
Avg. Rating: 12345
Rate it:
12345
Anonymous, 2009-05-26 07:25:48
I saved Corinthians for last, because this is the most laughable passage anti-gays pull out to condone their bigotry. Here’s the proper interpretation: I Corinthians 6:9-11 Let us examine that very closely. Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate [malakoi], nor homosexual offenders [arsenokoites], nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God. First of all, before we address this line, let us consider one thing. Supposedly taken from a 2000+ year old book, understand that the word "homosexual" was not coined until 1869 by Austrian-born novelist Karl-Maria Kertbeny. So how it happens to be included in a true reading of the particular biblical passage should make you ponder how accurate the interpretation actually is. So man changing the words of the Bible to conveniently spread hate? I think so. Now onto the interpretation, i’ve included the original Greek words as well where it’s relevant. Paul was attempting to educate the new Christians in Corinth as to what Godly living was all about. In verses 9-10, he listed ways of living that were not compatible with a Christ-centered life. In verse 11, Paul reminded them that they had been saved out of those destructive ways. There are two Greek words in I Corinthians 6:9, which sometimes are translated with a homosexual connotation. First word, "malakoi" or "malakos" - it literally means soft or mushy; it can mean spineless, wishy-washy or without backbone. "Malakoi" was used four other times in the New Testament and it always meant "soft." The context of I Corinthians seems to imply a moral softness or decadence, a failure to stand up for what is right and godly. It is significant that for several hundred years there was no sexual connotation assigned to this word. Second word, "arsenokoitai" or "arsenokoites" - it literally means, "males having sex." Early commentaries on I Corinthians related "arsenokoitai" to male temple prostitutes and to men having sex with boys. (Idolatrous prostitution and pedophilia are always wrong for those seeking to honor God.) Homosexual relationships were known in the Greco-Roman culture of Paul’s day. The Greek word commonly used in reference to adult male same sex partners was "arrenokoites." Paul did not use this word. Instead, he created his own, "arsenokoitai." If Paul had intended to condemn all adult male same sex partners, he would have used the common word for it.
Avg. Rating: 12345
Rate it:
12345
Anonymous, 2009-05-26 07:27:20
This is proof that when interpreted properly, Corinthians, Leviticus, the Sodom story, and Romans do NOT condemn homosexuality. Anti-gays twist these meanings to condone their bigotry. The same was done to black people, women, Jews, etc in the past. To any religious people in doubt or with open-minds, read the links above in my first post.
Avg. Rating: 12345
Rate it:
12345
Anonymous, 2009-06-01 17:50:12
This topic was debated on Patheos.com two weeks ago with articles from Tzvi Weinreb head of the Orthdox Union and Steve Greenberg, the first openly gay Orthodox ordained rabbi. Click on the Magen David icon and see the two viewpoints here: http://www.patheos.com/Public-Square/Same-Sex-Marriage-2.html?focus=x3195
Avg. Rating: 12345
Rate it:
12345


Back to: News » Home


FREE STUFF
IN PROVIDENCE
FEATURED BUSINESS

Glamorous Thursdays @ The Estate
Boston’s Original Gay Hip Hop and Top 40’s Party!

Put your business here»
BUY A HOME