News

Religious Right Furious Over YouTube Commenters Slamming Anti-Gay Marriage Video

by Steve Weinstein
Contributor
Tuesday Apr 14, 2009
  • PRINT
  • COMMENTS (5)
  • LARGE
  • MEDIUM
  • SMALL

A self-described Christian 12-year-old has made waves by posting some fuzzy homemade videos of himself expressing his opinions on gay marriage. He’s against. it. Scott, whose YouTube moniker is ChristianU2uber, has made 13 videos on the subject.

He’s also become the latest in a long line of YouTube 15-minute sensations (anyone still remember the "Leave Britney alone" kid? or the fat dancing Beyonce man?). His videos have approached 1 million hits over four weeks, which means more people then saw him than ever saw all of Shakespeare’s plays in his lifetime.

Here is a sample of his work:

But, as the Bard knew, with success comes challenges. In this case, it’s not the queen’s censor or the crowd in the cheap seats. It’s the notoriously trash talking YouTube commenters. This peanut gallery is apparently full of equal-opportunity insulters. When someone gay or gay-friendly posts a video, one can expect a welter of "faggot" and curses thrown at the poster.

In Scott’s case, he was called a "faggot" and told, among other things, most unprintable, to kill himself. Right-wing "news" site World Net Daily was shocked--shocked!--to find thousands of commenter slamming the boy. The site linked its story about Scott’s online virtual travails to "Foxe’s Book of Martyrs," which lists Protestant martyrs.

The comments on right-wing blog site Free Republic, perhaps predictably, discussed the hypocritical "tolerance of the left" and "Democrats being Democrats."

Some posters did seem to approach YouTube commenters with eyes open. "Anonymous punks with keyboards always post gutter tripe," wrote one. "Every YouTube video is filled with this spam." "It’s as if the author of this piece came across the comments section on YouTube for the first time in his/ her life," wrote another about the World Net Daily article.

The gay blog sites were also full of venom, albeit in the other direction. Some were sympathetic: "This is heartbreaking," wrote one. "I just hope the kid is able to get through the next few years without too much trouble."

Others noted that Scott could have disabled the comments. And most puzzled over Scott’s offhand remark that he "used to be gay."

As he says in a video: "At first I had no idea that it was a sin to get married if you’re gay but then I heard it on the news and, well, I figured it out and I used to be and then I decided it’s wrong and I stopped it and now I am very interested in girls."

Steve Weinstein has been a regular correspondent for the International Herald Tribune, the Advocate, the Village Voice and Out. He has been covering the AIDS crisis since the early ’80s, when he began his career. He is the author of "The Q Guide to Fire Island" (Alyson, 2007).

Comments

  • phifties, 2009-04-14 10:33:30

    Sounds like a child crying out for help, because he’s confused.


  • fern , 2009-04-14 17:00:56

    One of the reasons I seldom go on the youtube site, this is sick, his parents are sick allowing their kid to do this.


  • Focus On The Rainbow, 2009-04-14 20:48:13

    Thank you for running a story. I have been running an article with updates since Friday. Please go to the attached to read it and offer any help you can. Thank you, Lyndon Evans Publisher http://lgbtrainbowlinksfocus.blogspot.com/2009/04/there-is-young-man-on-internet-that.html


  • Anonymous, 2009-04-15 00:42:16

    ^^^ Whoa, you did a lot of research. Good point about the kid needing some more supervision and being disturbed. I’m not sure it’s gotten to the "Columbine" point, which you seem to be indicating. I also think when you post on YouTube, you’re fair game for the slammers - at any age.


  • Anonymous, 2009-04-16 05:13:25

    Could anybody explain the nexus between the hatemongering headline and the story the Editor-in-Chief wrote below it? I see reference to comments made on a right wing blog, without reference to the religious affiliation of the bloggers, and then I see the author point out the left wing responses were, it appears, equally hate filled, and yet there is this headline. Do radical homos think spewing cheap propaganda and manufacturing hate against religious Americans by demogoguery is part of some sort of winning strategy. Is this going to win friends and convince people of the rightness of our cause, or is it just more of the same stupid crap that lost us Prop 8 by aligning ourselves with the left by acting as its guard dogs. See what the "left" did to gays in California? There aren’t enough conservatives in the whole state to have defeated Prop 8. That was liberals by the millions who threw us under the bus. So, yeah, let’s make some more enemies, you left wing dummies. Brilliant.


Add New Comment

Comments on Facebook